Moodle vs. SCORM: Choosing the Right Approach for NGO Digital Learning
On November 27, 2024, Fabo Learning Lab hosted a session for the members of the Fabo Learning Community , "Moodle versus SCORM: Choosing the Right Approach for Digital Learning in NGOs."
The session explored the features, applications, and considerations of two essential tools for creating e-learning courses: Moodle and SCORM.
The interactive discussion aimed to equip participants with the knowledge to choose the most effective approach for their organisational learning needs.
"As NGOs, our focus should always be on creating learning solutions that are accessible, sustainable, and tailored to our audiences. By shifting from SCORM to more flexible tools like Moodle, we empower our organisations to innovate while keeping learners at the centre of our efforts."
What are Moodle and SCORM?
Moodle is an open-source Learning Management System (LMS) widely recognised for its flexibility, community-driven development, and capacity to support customised digital learning experiences.
In contrast, SCORM (Sharable Content Object Reference Model) is a set of technical standards for e-learning software, designed to ensure compatibility across different LMS platforms while enabling the reuse of highly interactive and adaptable content.
Why Use SCORM?
SCORM has traditionally been a popular choice for creating engaging e-learning content with tools like Storyline and Adobe Captivate. It enables compatibility with various LMS platforms, such as Fabo, Moodle, and Kaya Connect. Examples highlighted in the session included SCORM-based modules on Anti-Corruption and the Code of Conduct.
However, while SCORM offers robust interactivity and reusability, its limitations include:
- High Development Costs: Often requiring external consultants and specialized tools.
- Storage Challenges: SCORM packages can be large and cumbersome.
- Inflexibility: Difficulties in editing and updating content.
- Accessibility Issues: Limited offline usability and mobile-friendliness.
The Shift Towards Moodle and Other Alternatives
The session underscored a gradual move away from SCORM in favor of alternatives like Adapt and Moodle's native tools. These approaches address many of SCORM's limitations by providing:
- Flexibility: Easier updates and maintenance for content creators.
- Accessibility: Improved mobile and offline access.
- Cost Efficiency: Eliminating the need for heavy development resources.
- Customization: Targeted content tailored to diverse audiences.
The Fabo platform, leveraging Moodle, has proven particularly effective for NGO learning contexts, enabling streamlined course management, tracking, and reporting. Additionally, its open-source nature supports scalability and integration with other tools, such as Active Directory.
Key Takeaways for NGOs
Participants engaged in reflective exercises to identify their challenges in e-learning development. Recurring themes included the need for:
- Accessible content for diverse audiences.
- Integration and tracking capabilities.
- User-friendly tools for course creation.
- Sustainable maintenance practices.
The session concluded with a reminder: when in doubt about the best format for digital learning, the Fabo team is available to guide and support members as well as external NGOs in making informed decisions.
Final Thoughts
By understanding the strengths and limitations of both Moodle and SCORM, NGOs can make strategic choices that align with their goals, resources, and learner needs.
This session reinforced Fabo's commitment to fostering accessible, sustainable, and impactful e-learning within the humanitarian and development sectors.
Access More Courses on Fabo
You can access courses on Learning Experience Design, Cultural Inclusive Learning Design, How to create an accessible learning site and more on Fabo to strengthen your expertise and create real impact on the ground.